The Credibility and Reliability of Memory at Trial
Judges and juries are expected to determine if a complainant’s memory is reliable and can get it wrong with devastating consequences.
September 6, 2022
Judges and juries are expected to determine if a complainant’s memory is reliable and can get it wrong with devastating consequences.
The controversial new legislation for admissibility of private records in possession of the accused has been declared constitutional.
Systemic incoherence plagues Canadian courts in sexual assault cases since the 1980s.
Carceral feminist theory gets another win in the Supreme Court of Canada.
An obsessed woman stalked her ex-lover then demanded she personally cross-examine him in court.
The effect of activist groups on interpretation and influence within the supreme court.